KeithHennessey.com

No, but not for the reason you might think.

In each of the following four headline pairs, one is from this morning. The other is from last year. See if you can guess which is which.

Can Speaker Pelosi bring health care reform back from the dead? Did it ever really die?

I respond to a point in Budget Director Orszag and White House Health Policy Advisor DeParle’s Washington Post op-ed. America’s primary fiscal problem is the long-term growth of health entitlement spending. The Senate-passed bill creates a commitment for a new health entitlement program, and takes advantage of a gimmick to claim that this commitment is paid for. Instead, this bill would guarantee a future fiscal crisis.

Speaker Pelosi, Leader Reid, and their Administration allies face seven challenges in implementing the two bill strategy.

I am going to describe the mechanics of the anticipated “two bill strategy” to enact health care reform using reconciliation. If you don’t care about all this procedural mumbo jumbo you can skip this post and head over to my strategic analysis: Hurdles of the two bill strategy.

Conventional wisdom says the tenure of President George W. Bush was dominated by partisanship. This conventional wisdom ignores significant bipartisan legislative accomplishments led by President Bush. If President Obama wants bipartisan legislative success, he could learn a few things from his predecessor.

While I oppose the President’s health care proposals (old and new), I have to give the White House staff credit for a slick new website in advance of Thursday’s Blair House health care debate. I will highlight a few policy elements of the President’s new proposal, then turn to tactical analysis.

The President has invited Congressional leaders to the Blair House ten days from now to discuss health care reform. While the press has labeled it a summit, it has much more the feel of a televised debate, a kabuki dance played out for the cameras.

We need more serious policy debates and fewer spitting matches. Kudos to Mr. Ryan for playing offense and defense. Pushing good policy often involves political risk, but what’s the point of being in office if you don’t actually solve our most important policy problems? I hope more elected Republicans follow Ryan’s lead.