<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is $700 billion enough?  Clearing up the confusion (or at least trying to)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://keithhennessey.com/2009/04/02/tarp-math-clarity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://keithhennessey.com/2009/04/02/tarp-math-clarity/</link>
	<description>Your guide to American economic policy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 19:57:44 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission&#160;&#124;&#160;KeithHennessey.com</title>
		<link>http://keithhennessey.com/2009/04/02/tarp-math-clarity/comment-page-1/#comment-3653</link>
		<dc:creator>The Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission&#160;&#124;&#160;KeithHennessey.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 16:05:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://keithhennessey.com/?p=1488#comment-3653</guid>
		<description>[...] Is $700 billion enough? Clearing up the confusion (or at least trying to) [...]&lt;div class=&quot;comment-remix-meta&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; class=&quot;replyto&quot; onclick=&quot;replyto(&#039;3653&#039;,&#039;The Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission&nbsp;&#124;&nbsp;KeithHennessey.com&#039;); return false;&quot;&gt;Reply&lt;/a&gt;  - &lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; class=&quot;quote&quot; onclick=&quot;quote(&#039;3653&#039;,&#039;The Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission&nbsp;&#124;&nbsp;KeithHennessey.com&#039;,&#039;&#91;...&#93; Is $700 billion enough? Clearing up the confusion (or at least trying to) &#91;...&#93;&#039;); return false;&quot;&gt;Quote&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Is $700 billion enough? Clearing up the confusion (or at least trying to) [...]
<div class="comment-remix-meta"><a href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('3653','The Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission&amp;nbsp;|&amp;nbsp;KeithHennessey.com'); return false;">Reply</a>  &#8211; <a href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('3653','The Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission&amp;nbsp;|&amp;nbsp;KeithHennessey.com','&amp;#91;...&amp;#93; Is $700 billion enough? Clearing up the confusion (or at least trying to) &amp;#91;...&amp;#93;'); return false;">Quote</a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KeithHennessey.com » Three unpleasant options for TARP funding</title>
		<link>http://keithhennessey.com/2009/04/02/tarp-math-clarity/comment-page-1/#comment-110</link>
		<dc:creator>KeithHennessey.com » Three unpleasant options for TARP funding</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 15:15:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://keithhennessey.com/?p=1488#comment-110</guid>
		<description>[...] the $700 B Troubled Assets Relief Program (TARP).  In my last four posts on TARP funding (1 2 3 4), I have stuck to what I think I can demonstrate analytically.  I am now going to shift to some [...]&lt;div class=&quot;comment-remix-meta&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; class=&quot;replyto&quot; onclick=&quot;replyto(&#039;110&#039;,&#039;KeithHennessey.com &#194;&#187; Three unpleasant options for TARP funding&#039;); return false;&quot;&gt;Reply&lt;/a&gt;  - &lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; class=&quot;quote&quot; onclick=&quot;quote(&#039;110&#039;,&#039;KeithHennessey.com &#194;&#187; Three unpleasant options for TARP funding&#039;,&#039;&#91;...&#93; the $700 B Troubled Assets Relief Program (TARP).&#194;&#160; In my last four posts on TARP funding (1 2 3 4), I have stuck to what I think I can demonstrate analytically.&#194;&#160; I am now going to shift to some &#91;...&#93;&#039;); return false;&quot;&gt;Quote&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the $700 B Troubled Assets Relief Program (TARP).  In my last four posts on TARP funding (1 2 3 4), I have stuck to what I think I can demonstrate analytically.  I am now going to shift to some [...]
<div class="comment-remix-meta"><a href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('110','KeithHennessey.com &Acirc;&raquo; Three unpleasant options for TARP funding'); return false;">Reply</a>  &#8211; <a href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('110','KeithHennessey.com &Acirc;&raquo; Three unpleasant options for TARP funding','&amp;#91;...&amp;#93; the $700 B Troubled Assets Relief Program (TARP).&Acirc;&nbsp; In my last four posts on TARP funding (1 2 3 4), I have stuck to what I think I can demonstrate analytically.&Acirc;&nbsp; I am now going to shift to some &amp;#91;...&amp;#93;'); return false;">Quote</a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: boqueronman</title>
		<link>http://keithhennessey.com/2009/04/02/tarp-math-clarity/comment-page-1/#comment-111</link>
		<dc:creator>boqueronman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 18:12:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://keithhennessey.com/?p=1488#comment-111</guid>
		<description>This from the Texas Public Policy Foundation:

The ARRA Act of 2009 will increase the government expenditure wedge from 49.16% to 52.41% for an overall 3.25% increase. This increase will reduce the growth in real net business output by 2.5%, which translates to a reduction of 1.7 million jobs nationally&#8212;of which between 131,400 and 171,900 jobs will be lost in Texas.

Thanks Obama/Geithner team.  And I assume they will keep up the &quot;good&quot; work.  Sheesh.&lt;div class=&quot;comment-remix-meta&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; class=&quot;replyto&quot; onclick=&quot;replyto(&#039;111&#039;,&#039;boqueronman&#039;); return false;&quot;&gt;Reply&lt;/a&gt;  - &lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; class=&quot;quote&quot; onclick=&quot;quote(&#039;111&#039;,&#039;boqueronman&#039;,&#039;This from the Texas Public Policy Foundation:\n\nThe ARRA Act of 2009 will increase the government expenditure wedge from 49.16% to 52.41% for an overall 3.25% increase. This increase will reduce the growth in real net business output by 2.5%, which translates to a reduction of 1.7 million jobs nationally&mdash;of which between 131,400 and 171,900 jobs will be lost in Texas.\n\nThanks Obama\/Geithner team.  And I assume they will keep up the &quot;good&quot; work.  Sheesh.&#039;); return false;&quot;&gt;Quote&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This from the Texas Public Policy Foundation:</p>
<p>The ARRA Act of 2009 will increase the government expenditure wedge from 49.16% to 52.41% for an overall 3.25% increase. This increase will reduce the growth in real net business output by 2.5%, which translates to a reduction of 1.7 million jobs nationally&mdash;of which between 131,400 and 171,900 jobs will be lost in Texas.</p>
<p>Thanks Obama/Geithner team.  And I assume they will keep up the &quot;good&quot; work.  Sheesh.
<div class="comment-remix-meta"><a href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('111','boqueronman'); return false;">Reply</a>  &#8211; <a href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('111','boqueronman','This from the Texas Public Policy Foundation:\n\nThe ARRA Act of 2009 will increase the government expenditure wedge from 49.16% to 52.41% for an overall 3.25% increase. This increase will reduce the growth in real net business output by 2.5%, which translates to a reduction of 1.7 million jobs nationally&amp;mdash;of which between 131,400 and 171,900 jobs will be lost in Texas.\n\nThanks Obama\/Geithner team.  And I assume they will keep up the &amp;quot;good&amp;quot; work.  Sheesh.'); return false;">Quote</a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: links for 2009-04-03</title>
		<link>http://keithhennessey.com/2009/04/02/tarp-math-clarity/comment-page-1/#comment-109</link>
		<dc:creator>links for 2009-04-03</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 08:34:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://keithhennessey.com/?p=1488#comment-109</guid>
		<description>[...] Is 0 billion enough? Clearing up the confusion - Keith Hennessey [...]&lt;div class=&quot;comment-remix-meta&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; class=&quot;replyto&quot; onclick=&quot;replyto(&#039;109&#039;,&#039;links for 2009-04-03&#039;); return false;&quot;&gt;Reply&lt;/a&gt;  - &lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; class=&quot;quote&quot; onclick=&quot;quote(&#039;109&#039;,&#039;links for 2009-04-03&#039;,&#039;&#91;...&#93; Is 0 billion enough? Clearing up the confusion - Keith Hennessey &#91;...&#93;&#039;); return false;&quot;&gt;Quote&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Is 0 billion enough? Clearing up the confusion &#8211; Keith Hennessey [...]
<div class="comment-remix-meta"><a href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('109','links for 2009-04-03'); return false;">Reply</a>  &#8211; <a href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('109','links for 2009-04-03','&amp;#91;...&amp;#93; Is 0 billion enough? Clearing up the confusion - Keith Hennessey &amp;#91;...&amp;#93;'); return false;">Quote</a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wayne Marr</title>
		<link>http://keithhennessey.com/2009/04/02/tarp-math-clarity/comment-page-1/#comment-108</link>
		<dc:creator>Wayne Marr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 23:33:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://keithhennessey.com/?p=1488#comment-108</guid>
		<description>Keith, I found the post of interest. I have been following the TARP since the beginning as well as TALF and some of the other programs. It is not clear to me anyone knows what the true &quot;cost&quot; or in business &quot;the burn rate&quot;. Why, because of the many the assumptions that lie behind some of the numbers. Also, now we have some banks paying back TARP monies.

But the main point is that Obama and team (Larry, Christy, Austan, Geithner, etc) can simply go to well (Congress) since Democrats can pass pretty much what they want. The recovery plan was not named the &quot;Great Bailout:&quot; but the &quot;American Reconstruction and Recovery Plan&quot; or some such nonsense for a reason.

Why not another funding program called &quot;The Better Banking Plan for the 21th Century&quot; to provide more cash for technically insolvent banks? Or those that posed a systemic risk? So does it really matter that we have 30B left of TARP or 100B left for TARP?

Thanks again. I like your blog&lt;div class=&quot;comment-remix-meta&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; class=&quot;replyto&quot; onclick=&quot;replyto(&#039;108&#039;,&#039;Wayne Marr&#039;); return false;&quot;&gt;Reply&lt;/a&gt;  - &lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; class=&quot;quote&quot; onclick=&quot;quote(&#039;108&#039;,&#039;Wayne Marr&#039;,&#039;Keith, I found the post of interest. I have been following the TARP since the beginning as well as TALF and some of the other programs. It is not clear to me anyone knows what the true &quot;cost&quot; or in business &quot;the burn rate&quot;. Why, because of the many the assumptions that lie behind some of the numbers. Also, now we have some banks paying back TARP monies.\n\nBut the main point is that Obama and team (Larry, Christy, Austan, Geithner, etc) can simply go to well (Congress) since Democrats can pass pretty much what they want. The recovery plan was not named the &quot;Great Bailout:&quot; but the &quot;American Reconstruction and Recovery Plan&quot; or some such nonsense for a reason.\n\nWhy not another funding program called &quot;The Better Banking Plan for the 21th Century&quot; to provide more cash for technically insolvent banks? Or those that posed a systemic risk? So does it really matter that we have 30B left of TARP or 100B left for TARP?\n\nThanks again. I like your blog&#039;); return false;&quot;&gt;Quote&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Keith, I found the post of interest. I have been following the TARP since the beginning as well as TALF and some of the other programs. It is not clear to me anyone knows what the true &quot;cost&quot; or in business &quot;the burn rate&quot;. Why, because of the many the assumptions that lie behind some of the numbers. Also, now we have some banks paying back TARP monies.</p>
<p>But the main point is that Obama and team (Larry, Christy, Austan, Geithner, etc) can simply go to well (Congress) since Democrats can pass pretty much what they want. The recovery plan was not named the &quot;Great Bailout:&quot; but the &quot;American Reconstruction and Recovery Plan&quot; or some such nonsense for a reason.</p>
<p>Why not another funding program called &quot;The Better Banking Plan for the 21th Century&quot; to provide more cash for technically insolvent banks? Or those that posed a systemic risk? So does it really matter that we have 30B left of TARP or 100B left for TARP?</p>
<p>Thanks again. I like your blog
<div class="comment-remix-meta"><a href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('108','Wayne Marr'); return false;">Reply</a>  &#8211; <a href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('108','Wayne Marr','Keith, I found the post of interest. I have been following the TARP since the beginning as well as TALF and some of the other programs. It is not clear to me anyone knows what the true &amp;quot;cost&amp;quot; or in business &amp;quot;the burn rate&amp;quot;. Why, because of the many the assumptions that lie behind some of the numbers. Also, now we have some banks paying back TARP monies.\n\nBut the main point is that Obama and team (Larry, Christy, Austan, Geithner, etc) can simply go to well (Congress) since Democrats can pass pretty much what they want. The recovery plan was not named the &amp;quot;Great Bailout:&amp;quot; but the &amp;quot;American Reconstruction and Recovery Plan&amp;quot; or some such nonsense for a reason.\n\nWhy not another funding program called &amp;quot;The Better Banking Plan for the 21th Century&amp;quot; to provide more cash for technically insolvent banks? Or those that posed a systemic risk? So does it really matter that we have 30B left of TARP or 100B left for TARP?\n\nThanks again. I like your blog'); return false;">Quote</a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex C.</title>
		<link>http://keithhennessey.com/2009/04/02/tarp-math-clarity/comment-page-1/#comment-107</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex C.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 16:27:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://keithhennessey.com/?p=1488#comment-107</guid>
		<description>Keith,

While you worked in the white house, what was your experience of the political motives behind not publishing a table of data similar to what you are requesting from Tim Geithner? Does this lack of transparency reflect Geithner&#039;s inexperience as a public official of the Treasury or a larger tradition within the department?

Also, what is your thought about the quality the Treasury&#039;s accounting measures? Do you think that the Treasury is accurately recording it&#039;s TARP payments and making reasonable models to calculate the risk of bad debt on these payments?&lt;div class=&quot;comment-remix-meta&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; class=&quot;replyto&quot; onclick=&quot;replyto(&#039;107&#039;,&#039;Alex C.&#039;); return false;&quot;&gt;Reply&lt;/a&gt;  - &lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; class=&quot;quote&quot; onclick=&quot;quote(&#039;107&#039;,&#039;Alex C.&#039;,&#039;Keith,\n\nWhile you worked in the white house, what was your experience of the political motives behind not publishing a table of data similar to what you are requesting from Tim Geithner? Does this lack of transparency reflect Geithner&#039;s inexperience as a public official of the Treasury or a larger tradition within the department?\n\nAlso, what is your thought about the quality the Treasury&#039;s accounting measures? Do you think that the Treasury is accurately recording it&#039;s TARP payments and making reasonable models to calculate the risk of bad debt on these payments?&#039;); return false;&quot;&gt;Quote&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Keith,</p>
<p>While you worked in the white house, what was your experience of the political motives behind not publishing a table of data similar to what you are requesting from Tim Geithner? Does this lack of transparency reflect Geithner&#039;s inexperience as a public official of the Treasury or a larger tradition within the department?</p>
<p>Also, what is your thought about the quality the Treasury&#039;s accounting measures? Do you think that the Treasury is accurately recording it&#039;s TARP payments and making reasonable models to calculate the risk of bad debt on these payments?
<div class="comment-remix-meta"><a href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('107','Alex C.'); return false;">Reply</a>  &#8211; <a href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('107','Alex C.','Keith,\n\nWhile you worked in the white house, what was your experience of the political motives behind not publishing a table of data similar to what you are requesting from Tim Geithner? Does this lack of transparency reflect Geithner&amp;#039;s inexperience as a public official of the Treasury or a larger tradition within the department?\n\nAlso, what is your thought about the quality the Treasury&amp;#039;s accounting measures? Do you think that the Treasury is accurately recording it&amp;#039;s TARP payments and making reasonable models to calculate the risk of bad debt on these payments?'); return false;">Quote</a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
